Skip to content

May 19, 1554 – Elizabeth Released from the Tower on the Anniversary of Her Mother’s Execution

Glenda Jackson (as Elizabeth) looking up at the sky in celebration of her release
The wonderful Glenda Jackson in the BBC’s Elizabeth R series, celebrating her release

There is so much to unpack here…

Elizabeth had been brought to the Tower in March, accused of participating in Thomas Wyatt’s treasonous rebellion. Confined in the same rooms that had held Anne Boleyn before her execution, Elizabeth had maintained her innocence throughout harsh questioning. It helped that, despite all their efforts, the government had only two pieces of real “evidence” against her: Wyatt’s testimony that he had sent her a letter warning her to move to a safer location (her response: “Where is my reply?”), and servants’ admissions that she had indeed considered removing to Donnington Casle (this she first denied, but then switched to “Might I not visit all of my houses? Do any of you deny that it is a good thing to visit your properties?”).  Both the Spanish Ambassador and Stephen Gardiner were urging Queen Mary to execute her anyway – but cooler heads insisted they needed to wait for more proof before a jury would find her guilty.

Then it all turned around. On the scaffold, Wyatt exonerated her fully, swearing just before the axe fell that she had never been party to the uprising. Shortly after that, they started bringing the other conspirators to trial. Nicholas Throckmorton was acquitted (the only known Tudor-era acquittal for treason!!) – and while the government immediately arrested the jurors in the case to discourage similar outcomes, two days later almost half the jurors in Sir James Croft’s trial voted to acquit him as well. At that point, the government realized they could not bring Elizabeth to trial without risking a similar result.

What comes next is a wild (admittedly unconfirmed) story that Stephen Gardiner tried to take matters into his own hands. Mary fell ill and while she was incommunicado in her rooms, he used his position as Lord Chancellor to sign Elizabeth’s death warrant. The Constable of the Tower was ready to fulfill his instructions, but Elizabeth convinced him that it was a trick: she had not been tried, and the warrant was not signed by the one person who was authorized to sign it – it would have been the Constable’s neck on the line. Sure enough, Gardiner responded to the confrontation by saying he had just delivering the warrant “for form” but without intending it to be used…

That was the point at which they had to release her. Admittedly, they kept her under house arrest at Woodstock, but at least she left the Tower. She was released on May 19, the same day her mother had been executed eighteen years earlier, falsely accused of sleeping with five men because Henry VIII wanted to marry again and did not want to leave an ex-wife running around. Talk about from darkness to light!

***

If you like my posts, you’ll love my books! Nothing Proved is my newest, the story of Elizabeth Tudor’s journey from bastard to queen. Get it now through your favorite platform – AmazonBarnes & NobleKoboApple, your own independent bookstore, or even directly from me!

(PS Already read it? Did you love it? Then please review it – even just a stars rating! It makes a huge difference in helping new readers find them and would mean the world to me!)

Published inOn This Day

4 Comments

  1. I’m enjoying NOTHING PROVED! One question re. “the warrant was not signed by the one person who was authorized to sign it .” Am I correct to assume that this was Queen Mary?

  2. Fiona Walker Fiona Walker

    What a dramatic story. It must have been very emotional for Elizabeth to find herself imprisoned in the same apartments as her mother all those years earlier, and the way her release to coincides with the anniversary of Anne’s death is extraordinary.

    With reference to Throckmorton being the only Tudor era person found not guilty of treason. I may well be wrong, but I believed that Arthur Plantagenet was also cleared of treason (although he died of a heart attack before he could be released)? Also that Edward Seymour Duke of Somerset was actually found not guilty of treason (although he was immediately afterwards found guilty of misappropriation of state funds, (which also carried a death penalty )- so it didn’t do him much good either.

    • I was indeed a bit offhand, but acquittals were almost impossible…and as for Somerset, I believe that Northumberland made sure he was found guilty of SOMETHING that carried the death penalty!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.